CSR automation should manage the evidence and review—not just produce prose.
A coordinated team of specialized agents for CSR source interpretation, drafting, traceability checks and medical-writing workflow management.
Discuss CronoLex →Separate agents draft, check and coordinate the work.
The product story is controlled orchestration with source-aware checking and accountable medical-writer review—not autonomous document generation.
Organize the protocol, SAP, TLFs, datasets and other approved inputs needed for the CSR workflow.
Extract the information needed from tables, listings and figures and route it to the appropriate CSR sections.
Generate section-level first drafts using configured templates, source context and study-specific requirements.
Where source integration supports it, make key narrative content easier to verify against the underlying source.
Use separate verification passes to identify mismatches, missing context and cross-section inconsistencies for review.
Track comments, assignments, versions, review states and final medical-writer decisions in one workflow.
CSR workflow support across three study environments.
Rapid study-report cycles
Structure reporting around intensive study conduct, PK/PD and safety outputs while keeping source review and medical-writer control visible.
Large, source-heavy CSRs
Coordinate complex source packages, section ownership, data narratives, review cycles and cross-functional medical-writing workflow.
Controlled report authoring
Apply the same source-to-draft-to-check workflow with study-appropriate templates, terminology and review requirements.
Approved sources move through specialized agents to accountable review.
Each stage has a distinct role, so inputs, machine-assisted work and final medical-writing decisions remain visually and operationally separate.
Map your current CSR workflow.
Start with source intake, repeat drafting work, medical-writing review cycles, quality checks and version-control friction.
